LEADER 00000cam a2200493Ma 4500 003 OCoLC 005 20240129213017.0 006 m u 007 cr cn ||| | 008 150903s2014 xx o ||| 0 eng d 020 |q(MIT55407) 024 8 53863MIT55407 035 (OCoLC)1159615374 040 UKBTH|beng|cUKBTH|dOCLCF|dOCLCO|dOCLCQ|dOCLCO 049 INap 099 eBook O'Reilly for Public Libraries 100 1 Sonne, Thorkil,|eauthor. 245 14 The Dandelion Principle :|bRedesigning Work for the Innovation Economy|h[electronic resource] /|cSonne, Thorkil.|h[O'Reilly electronic resource] 250 1st edition. 264 1 |bMIT Sloan Management Review,|c2014. 300 1 online resource (6 p.) 336 text|btxt|2rdacontent 337 computer|bc|2rdamedia 338 online resource|bcr|2rdacarrier 347 text file 365 |b6.50 520 In May 2013, software giant SAP announced plans to hire hundreds of people diagnosed with autism, with a target of having people with autism represent 1% of the company's work force by 2020. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines autism as a developmental disorder associated with "impairment of the ability to communicate with others" and "preoccupation with repetitive activities of restricted focus." Companies don't typically seek out these characteristics in new hires. But SAP took a different perspective. "We share a common belief that innovation comes from the 'edges,'" one SAP executive stated in the company's press release. "Only by employing people who think differently and spark innovation will SAP be prepared to handle the challenges of the 21st century." More specifically, the company had discovered that some people with autism have abilities that are extremely well- suited to performing some vital information technology tasks. SAP's move embodies an emerging management principle -- the authors Robert D. Austin and Thorkil Sonne call it "the dandelion principle" -- and offers an alternative way of thinking about human resources management. In some ways, the "dandelion principle" turns some of the basic tenets about how to recruit and manage people inside out. The authors use the dandelion as metaphor because, they note, dandelions are actually nutritious -- but are seen as weeds in the context of a green lawn that demands uniformity. The industrial economy, the authors argue, required uniformity in operations. In the industrial economy, companies could often win by operating more efficiently than rivals. Today, that's no longer enough. Faced with lower-cost competition from developing countries, established companies also need to innovate, to offer products that are better than what's available from competitors. But innovation, the authors observe, calls for organizational capabilities different than efficiency. Efficiency requires getting people and machines to mesh more smoothly; the emphasis is on parts fitting in and reducing variation around averages. Innovation, by contrast, involves finding new and better ideas and using new processes. Managing innovation is less about averages and more about understanding outliers. The emphasis is on increasing interesting variation, then identifying value in some of the variants. In an innovation-oriented economy, the authors contend, companies may benefit from accommodating employees wit... 542 |fCopyright © 2014 MIT Sloan Management Review|g2014 550 Made available through: Safari, an O'Reilly Media Company. 590 O'Reilly|bO'Reilly Online Learning: Academic/Public Library Edition 650 0 Creative ability in business. 650 0 Creative thinking. 650 0 Technological innovations. 650 0 New products. 650 6 Créativité dans les affaires. 650 6 Innovations. 650 7 Creative ability in business|2fast 650 7 Creative thinking|2fast 650 7 New products|2fast 650 7 Technological innovations|2fast 700 1 Austin, Robert,|eauthor.|0(uri) http://id.loc.gov/ authorities/names/nr98026798|0(uri) http://viaf.org/viaf/ sourceID/LC%7cnr98026798 710 2 Safari, an O'Reilly Media Company. 856 40 |uhttps://ezproxy.naperville-lib.org/login?url=https:// learning.oreilly.com/library/view/~/53863MIT55407/?ar |zAvailable on O'Reilly for Public Libraries 994 92|bJFN